Draft guidelines to help improve practice when the state acts to safeguard a baby at birth have been published by Nuffield Family Justice Observatory (Nuffield FJO) and are being tested for feasibility in sites across England and Wales.
Read the full guidelines here
Read the full report here
When the state intervenes to safeguard a baby at or close to birth, it is traumatic for birth parents and painful for professionals. When the safeguarding action results in parent and baby separation, this can be a life-changing course of action with many inherent and unresolved ethical and practice dilemmas. There is a need for more national guidance for professionals working in children’s social care, health services and the courts to ensure best practice.
In response, Nuffield FJO has published a draft set of best practice guidelines, developed through a collaborative research study involving professionals and parents in eight local authorities and seven corresponding NHS trusts in England and Wales. Part of Nuffield FJO’s Born into Care series, the work has been led by the Centre for Child & Family Justice Research at Lancaster University and the Rees Centre at Oxford University.
The research study aimed to identify key challenges and good practice examples from different stages of parents’ journeys (pre-birth, maternity settings and the return home). It explored compulsory state intervention at birth from the perspectives of parents and professionals, and included focus groups and interviews with parents who had been separated from their babies at birth, midwives, social workers, Cafcass workers, foster carers and heads of local authority legal services. The research identified consensus among frontline practitioners and parents about what constitutes best practice when local authorities issue care proceedings at birth – but also uncovered numerous challenges, ranging from discontinuities, delays and resource constraints to risk adverse practice, shortfalls in a family-inclusive practice, insufficient professional specialism and poor inter-agency collaboration.
The draft guidelines are based on these data, and aim to deliver better and more consistent practice. They include a series of aspirational statements for each stage of the parents’ journey and provide examples of how these statements can be translated into best practice.